AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS OPERATIONAL STRATEGY, 1976-1986
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
OLD BATTLE-CRIES AND BORROWED LANGUAGE - The ANC's operational strategic heritage, 1960-1975
![]()
YOU ONLY WIN ONCE - Prioritising armed struggle, January 1974-June 1976
![]()
UNPREPARED - Soweto and All That, June 1976-October 1978
![]()
A TURN TO THE MASSES - The Quest for a Political Base, October 1978-August 1979
![]()
ARMED PROPAGANDA AND NON-COLLABORATION - Rationalising weakness, August 1979-December 1980
CONSCRIPTS TO THEIR AGE: AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS OPERATIONAL STRATEGY, 1976-1986
By Howard Barrell
St Antony's CollegeD.Phil. thesis in Politics, Faculty of Social Studies,
University of Oxford, Trinity Term, 1993.
ABSTRACT
There was a consistency to ANC operational strategy between 1976 and 1986 even when there was a change in tactics. The ANC always treated armed struggle as the central feature of its operational strategy, the ultimate aim of which was the forcible overthrow of the South African state. As a result, military imperatives invariably dictated the form the ANC sought to give to its political deployments.
The ANC's armed struggle remained at a very low level of intensity, however, and posed no military threat to the South African state. A determination to correct this weakness motivated most ANC attempts to reshape operational structures and political mobilisation. By the mid-1980s, however, the ANC's armed struggle was, patently, a military failure. Moreover, political mobilisation by political means, much of it initially undertaken to bolster armed struggle, posed a more serious challenge to the state than armed struggle. Yet the ANC persisted with its armed struggle, and its operational strategy still accorded armed force the crucial role in securing fundamental change in South Africa.
If armed struggle was a failure, in the context of state-induced reforms in the 1980s, why then did the ANC persist with it? One reason was the ANC's choice of strategic discourse: it held that fundamental political change necessarily entailed the use of violence; and it seemed to lack criteria on which to falsify activity. Another was that the brutal humiliations of apartheid appeared to require an armed response. A third was that, as it made strategy in the present, the ANC was trying to justify its past as much as it was framing future intentions. But the main reason for persisting with armed struggle was the political dividend the ANC derived from it. The authority and popularity that armed struggle gave the ANC explains the paradox in its trajectory: the more it failed, the more it succeeded.
Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of D.Phil. in Politics in the Faculty of Social Studies, University of Oxford, Trinity Term, 1993.
Length: 98,000 words
![]()
TOWARDS A BROAD FRONT - And Other Desirable Accidents, January 1981-January 1983
![]()
PLANNING FOR PEOPLE'S WAR - `Blow on the embers and it will catch alight', January 1983-March 1984
![]()
LEADING FROM BEHIND - Virtue and necessity, April 1984-June 1985
![]()
TACTICS OF TALKS, TACTICS OF CONFRONTATION - The Road to Vula, July 1985-December 1986
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()





