AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS OPERATIONAL STRATEGY, 1976-1986

 

"To all these people and organisations, and others who helped but whom I have not had space to mention, my deep gratitude..."

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

"ENEMIES DEPEND UPON EACH OTHER to sustain their wars and, if neither is a clear-cut winner in that process, no less so if they make peace..."

 

 

OLD BATTLE-CRIES AND BORROWED LANGUAGE - The ANC's operational strategic heritage, 1960-1975

 

 

YOU ONLY WIN ONCE - Prioritising armed struggle, January 1974-June 1976

 

 

UNPREPARED - Soweto and All That, June 1976-October 1978

 

 

A TURN TO THE MASSES - The Quest for a Political Base, October 1978-August 1979

 

 

ARMED PROPAGANDA AND NON-COLLABORATION - Rationalising weakness, August 1979-December 1980

 

CONSCRIPTS TO THEIR AGE: AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS OPERATIONAL STRATEGY, 1976-1986

 

By Howard Barrell
St Antony's College

D.Phil. thesis in Politics, Faculty of Social Studies,
University of Oxford, Trinity Term, 1993.

 

ABSTRACT

 

There was a consistency to ANC operational strategy between 1976 and 1986 even when there was a change in tactics. The ANC always treated armed struggle as the central feature of its operational strategy, the ultimate aim of which was the forcible overthrow of the South African state. As a result, military imperatives invariably dictated the form the ANC sought to give to its political deployments.

 

The ANC's armed struggle remained at a very low level of intensity, however, and posed no military threat to the South African state. A determination to correct this weakness motivated most ANC attempts to reshape operational structures and political mobilisation. By the mid-1980s, however, the ANC's armed struggle was, patently, a military failure. Moreover, political mobilisation by political means, much of it initially undertaken to bolster armed struggle, posed a more serious challenge to the state than armed struggle. Yet the ANC persisted with its armed struggle, and its operational strategy still accorded armed force the crucial role in securing fundamental change in South Africa.

 

If armed struggle was a failure, in the context of state-induced reforms in the 1980s, why then did the ANC persist with it? One reason was the ANC's choice of strategic discourse: it held that fundamental political change necessarily entailed the use of violence; and it seemed to lack criteria on which to falsify activity. Another was that the brutal humiliations of apartheid appeared to require an armed response. A third was that, as it made strategy in the present, the ANC was trying to justify its past as much as it was framing future intentions. But the main reason for persisting with armed struggle was the political dividend the ANC derived from it. The authority and popularity that armed struggle gave the ANC explains the paradox in its trajectory: the more it failed, the more it succeeded.

 

Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of D.Phil. in Politics in the Faculty of Social Studies, University of Oxford, Trinity Term, 1993.

 

Length: 98,000 words

 

TOWARDS A BROAD FRONT - And Other Desirable Accidents, January 1981-January 1983

 

 

PLANNING FOR PEOPLE'S WAR - `Blow on the embers and it will catch alight', January 1983-March 1984

 

 

LEADING FROM BEHIND - Virtue and necessity, April 1984-June 1985

 

 

TACTICS OF TALKS, TACTICS OF CONFRONTATION - The Road to Vula, July 1985-December 1986

 

 

CONCLUSION

 

 

"In July 1990, five months after the South African government had unbanned the ANC, security police in Durban raided a local house..."

 

 

"This bibliography includes all books, articles and primary material referred to in the text and footnotes, as well as a few additional works which were significant in informing this dissertation..."

 

 

"THE EXTREMITY OF CONFLICT in a revolutionary struggle can create a number of difficulties for someone attempting a serious study of such a struggle..."